PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKU vs. LYFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ROKU vs. LYFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roku, Inc. (ROKU) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKU achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than LYFT's -27.62% return.


ROKU

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
13.90%
6M
21.50%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
-18.31%
10Y*

LYFT

1D
2.71%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
-27.62%
6M
-37.66%
1Y
-9.72%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
-24.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKU vs. LYFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
13.90%45.94%-18.90%125.21%-82.16%-31.27%147.96%107.56%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
-27.62%50.16%-13.94%36.03%-74.21%-13.03%14.20%-45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKU and LYFT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019

0.39

The correlation between ROKU and LYFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROKU:

$18.66B

LYFT:

$5.64B

EPS

ROKU:

$1.34

LYFT:

$6.90

PE Ratio

ROKU:

92.52

LYFT:

2.03

PS Ratio

ROKU:

3.75

LYFT:

0.89

PB Ratio

ROKU:

6.99

LYFT:

1.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROKU:

$4.97B

LYFT:

$6.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROKU:

$2.19B

LYFT:

$2.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROKU:

$280.30M

LYFT:

$51.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROKU vs. LYFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKU
ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LYFT
LYFT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LYFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKU vs. LYFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKULYFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.01

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

-0.20

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

-0.35

+6.26

ROKU vs. LYFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the LYFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKU and LYFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKULYFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

-0.19

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.36

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

-0.31

+0.60

Drawdowns

ROKU vs. LYFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKU drawdown since its inception was -91.91%, roughly equal to the maximum LYFT drawdown of -89.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKU and LYFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKULYFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.91%

-89.79%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.69%

-48.51%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.65%

-55.23%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.91%

-87.28%

-4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.23%

-82.09%

+7.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.82%

-64.72%

+11.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.74%

27.84%

-18.10%

Volatility

ROKU vs. LYFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) is 9.01%, while Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that ROKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKULYFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

12.33%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.22%

34.77%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.52%

50.18%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.61%

67.45%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.37%

68.19%

+5.18%

Dividends

ROKU vs. LYFT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROKU nor LYFT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ROKU vs. LYFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roku, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
1.25B
1.65B
(ROKU) Total Revenue
(LYFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROKU vs. LYFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Roku, Inc. and Lyft, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
45.2%
47.6%
Portfolio components
ROKU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.

LYFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.

ROKU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

LYFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

ROKU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

LYFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROKU and LYFT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFT has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to ROKU (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKU dropped -91.91% vs LYFT's -89.79%.

ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROKU and LYFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer