PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKT vs. XLII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROKT vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 46.55% return, which is significantly higher than XLII's 6.73% return.


ROKT

1D
-3.71%
1M
12.62%
YTD
46.55%
6M
60.20%
1Y
111.37%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*

XLII

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.45%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and XLII is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.67

ROKT vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROKT
XLII

Industrials

67.6%

-

Technology

20.2%

-

Energy

6.4%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ROKT
67.6%
XLII

-

Technology

ROKT
20.2%
XLII

-

Energy

ROKT
6.4%
XLII

-

Communication Services

ROKT
5.9%
XLII

-

Basic Materials

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Consumer Cyclical

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Consumer Defensive

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Financial Services

ROKT

-

XLII
100.3%

Healthcare

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Real Estate

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Utilities

ROKT

-

XLII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROKT vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XLII
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKTXLIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.81

ROKT vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKTXLIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.44

-0.58

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and XLII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKTXLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-10.10%

-33.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-0.36%

-8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-1.34%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

Volatility

ROKT vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKTXLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

11.55%

+17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

11.55%

+11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.14%

11.55%

+13.59%

ROKT vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROKT vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than XLII's 11.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.27%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%
XLII
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.29%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROKT and XLII have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.

ROKT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ROKT and 0.35% for XLII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROKT and XLII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer