ROKT vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
ROKT and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROKT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. Both ROKT and IGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROKT vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROKT vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 16.96% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.19% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -2.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.19% return.
ROKT
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 87.29%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROKT vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROKT vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
ROKT
IGF
ROKT vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROKT | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.00 | 2.10 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 2.77 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | 3.10 | +3.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.82 | 15.62 | +9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROKT | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 2.10 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.82 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.24 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROKT and IGF is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ROKT vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than IGF's 2.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.95% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
ROKT vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and IGF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROKT | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -58.33% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.36% | -8.74% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | -20.83% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -3.42% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -11.96% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.74% | +1.75% |
Volatility
ROKT vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.25%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROKT | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 4.25% | +6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 7.33% | +15.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.22% | 12.73% | +16.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 13.89% | +7.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 16.81% | +7.97% |