PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROE vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ROE vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ROE vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.75%17.20%18.34%4.29%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-7.62%10.72%16.38%3.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's -7.62% return.


ROE

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
0.75%
6M
3.04%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOT

1D
3.09%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-7.62%
6M
-12.08%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROE vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ROE vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROE vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROEVOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

0.28

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

0.55

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.07

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.38

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.05

1.20

+7.85

ROE vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROE and VOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROEVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.28

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.42

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between ROE and VOT is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ROE vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than VOT's 0.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
1.13%0.97%1.18%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.72%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Drawdowns

ROE vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and VOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ROEVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.10%

-60.16%

+41.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-15.96%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-13.36%

+7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-10.01%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

5.10%

-2.52%

Volatility

ROE vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is 5.80%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that ROE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ROEVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

6.50%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

12.32%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

21.01%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

21.33%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

20.92%

-5.01%