RODM vs. DBMF
RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. RODM is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RODM returned 9.73%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RODM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
RODM vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.48% return.
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
RODM vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 8.07% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.48% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between RODM and DBMF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.14 |
The correlation between RODM and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RODM vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
RODM
DBMF
RODM vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RODM | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 4.48 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 16.18 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RODM vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RODM | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -20.39% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -6.10% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -15.60% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | -20.39% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.72% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -6.56% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.68% | +0.10% |
Volatility
RODM vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.68%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RODM | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 2.68% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 10.00% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 12.37% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 12.55% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 12.41% | +2.81% |
RODM vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RODM vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than DBMF's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.18% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RODM and DBMF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RODM has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to DBMF (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, RODM leads with 9.73% vs 8.18% for DBMF. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 2.78% for RODM.
RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.85% for DBMF.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RODM and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer