ROCY vs. IWMI
ROCY (JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROCY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.
Performance
ROCY vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ROCY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROCY vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 12.15% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 17.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCY and IWMI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROCY vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
ROCY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWMI
ROCY vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROCY | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROCY vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCY drawdown since its inception was -3.53%, smaller than the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCY and IWMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCY | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -23.88% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.82% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -3.92% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
ROCY vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROCY | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 15.28% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 17.74% | -6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 17.74% | -6.37% |
ROCY vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROCY vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
ROCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than IWMI's 13.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 13.37% | 14.05% | 8.78% |
ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROCY and IWMI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IWMI.
IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 13.37%, compared with 2.29% for ROCY.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCY and 0.68% for IWMI.
Find the right allocation for ROCY and IWMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer