PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBT vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-11.94%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and KNG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between ROBT and KNG has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ROBT vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBT
KNG

Technology

57.0%
4.3%

Industrials

20.4%
20.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Financial Services

1.6%
12.7%

Energy

1.5%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
23.5%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

ROBT
57.0%
KNG
4.3%

Industrials

ROBT
20.4%
KNG
20.3%

Healthcare

ROBT
7.4%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBT
6.6%
KNG
5.5%

Communication Services

ROBT
4.1%
KNG

-

Financial Services

ROBT
1.6%
KNG
12.7%

Energy

ROBT
1.5%
KNG
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

ROBT
1.4%
KNG
23.5%

Basic Materials

ROBT

-

KNG
10.2%

Real Estate

ROBT

-

KNG
4.4%

Utilities

ROBT

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBTKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.87

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

2.25

+1.84

ROBT vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBTKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.73

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.32

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.49

-0.14

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-35.12%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-8.61%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-14.24%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-18.20%

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-5.89%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-4.13%

-11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

3.32%

+4.21%

Volatility

ROBT vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBTKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

2.29%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

7.39%

+10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

10.19%

+13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

13.59%

+11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

17.18%

+8.30%

ROBT vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBT vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBT and KNG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 4.31% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

ROBT is categorized as Technology Equities, while KNG is Dividend. ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.75% for KNG.

ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer