ROBO vs. HTUS
Compare and contrast key facts about ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS).
ROBO and HTUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROBO is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2013. HTUS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Jun 25, 2015.
Performance
ROBO vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROBO vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | -1.27% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 44.26% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | -3.85% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's -3.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROBO having a 11.09% annualized return and HTUS not far behind at 10.99%.
ROBO
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
HTUS
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROBO vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
HTUS
ROBO vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBO | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.79 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.37 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.99 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 6.79 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBO | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.79 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.71 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.52 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and HTUS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ROBO vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than HTUS's 12.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 12.37% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and HTUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -47.50% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -17.90% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -24.41% | -19.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | -47.50% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -5.29% | -8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -4.11% | -8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 2.61% | +1.92% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 6.36%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 6.36% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 9.24% | +7.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.06% | 21.90% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 18.99% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 21.38% | +1.56% |