PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBN vs. TTDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBN vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -60.08% return, which is significantly higher than TTDU's -77.55% return.


ROBN

1D
-12.05%
1M
10.71%
YTD
-60.08%
6M
-72.54%
1Y
-29.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ROBN
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
-60.08%-25.47%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and TTDU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBN vs. TTDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN
ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TTDU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBNTTDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

ROBN vs. TTDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBNTTDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.87

+0.84

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TTDU drawdown of -89.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and TTDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBNTTDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.84%

-89.89%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.36%

-89.89%

+8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-59.22%

+16.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.11%

Volatility

ROBN vs. TTDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBNTTDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.84%

107.88%

+29.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.35%

107.88%

+44.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.35%

107.88%

+44.47%

ROBN vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TTDU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBN vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, while TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ROBN and TTDU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROBN is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROBN is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 1.50% for TTDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBN and TTDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer