PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNW vs. FINV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNW vs. FINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and FinVolution Group (FINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNW achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than FINV's -7.69% return.


RNW

1D
2.12%
1M
-2.49%
6M
15.47%
YTD
10.97%
1Y
-15.95%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
-8.86%
10Y*

FINV

1D
-4.42%
1M
-9.74%
6M
-3.63%
YTD
-7.69%
1Y
-54.45%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
-5.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNW vs. FINV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RNW
ReNew Energy Global plc
10.97%-17.28%-10.84%39.27%-29.31%-29.27%
FINV
FinVolution Group
-7.69%-20.07%45.47%4.39%6.39%46.45%

Correlation

The correlation between RNW and FINV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNW:

$2.28B

FINV:

$1.13B

EPS

RNW:

₹28.22

FINV:

CN¥8.34

PE Ratio

RNW:

21.19

FINV:

3.69

PEG Ratio

RNW:

0.09

FINV:

1.29

PS Ratio

RNW:

1.66

FINV:

0.61

PB Ratio

RNW:

1.80

FINV:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNW:

₹132.90B

FINV:

CN¥13.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNW:

₹93.10B

FINV:

CN¥10.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNW:

₹88.90B

FINV:

CN¥2.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNW vs. FINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNW
RNW Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNW Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNW Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FINV
FINV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNW vs. FINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and FinVolution Group (FINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNWFINVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.79

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.95

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

-1.21

+0.59

RNW vs. FINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the FINV Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNW and FINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNW vs. FINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNW drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum FINV drawdown of -89.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNW and FINV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWFINVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-89.76%

+24.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.05%

-56.42%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.05%

-56.42%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.24%

-63.30%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.88%

-54.45%

+6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.70%

-54.07%

+11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.19%

43.95%

-18.76%

Volatility

RNW vs. FINV - Volatility Comparison

ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and FinVolution Group (FINV) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWFINVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

9.75%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.54%

33.79%

-11.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.58%

48.68%

-9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.44%

49.30%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.93%

71.52%

-25.59%

Dividends

RNW vs. FINV - Dividend Comparison

RNW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FINV
FinVolution Group
6.74%5.30%3.49%4.39%4.13%3.45%4.49%7.17%
RNW
ReNew Energy Global plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RNW vs. FINV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ReNew Energy Global plc and FinVolution Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
32.29B
3.19B
(RNW) Total Revenue
(FINV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RNW values in INR, FINV values in CNY

RNW vs. FINV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ReNew Energy Global plc and FinVolution Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
48.9%
76.3%
Portfolio components
RNW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a gross profit of 15.78B and revenue of 32.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

FINV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FinVolution Group reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

RNW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported an operating income of 9.55B and revenue of 32.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.

FINV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FinVolution Group reported an operating income of 526.49M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

RNW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a net income of 789.09M and revenue of 32.29B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

FINV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FinVolution Group reported a net income of 412.55M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNW and FINV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNW has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to FINV (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNW dropped -64.92% vs FINV's -89.76%.

RNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNW and FINV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer