RNW vs. DUK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK).

Performance

RNW vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RNW vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RNW ReNew Energy Global plc	-18.94%	-17.28%	-10.84%	39.27%	-29.31%	-28.69%
DUK Duke Energy Corporation	12.67%	12.72%	15.56%	-1.63%	2.03%	17.07%

Fundamentals

EPS RNW : $32.55 DUK : $9.62
PE Ratio RNW : 0.14 DUK : 13.62
PEG Ratio RNW : 0.00 DUK : 1.07
PS Ratio RNW : 0.01 DUK : 2.10
Total Revenue (TTM) RNW : $129.66B DUK : $32.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) RNW : $100.99B DUK : $22.67B
EBITDA (TTM) RNW : $92.34B DUK : $15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNW achieves a -18.94% return, which is significantly lower than DUK's 12.67% return.

RNW

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -17.03%
• YTD: -18.94%
• 6M: -40.52%
• 1Y: -22.24%
• 3Y*: -6.59%
• 5Y*: -14.75%
• 10Y*: —

DUK

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RNW vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNW

RNW Risk / Return Rank: 18
RNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
RNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RNW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RNW Martin Ratio Rank: 17

DUK

DUK Risk / Return Rank: 63
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNW vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNW	DUK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	0.70	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	1.04	-1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.13	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	1.24	-1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	2.92	-4.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNW vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNW and DUK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNW	DUK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	0.70	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	0.60	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	0.50	-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between RNW and DUK is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RNW vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

RNW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNW ReNew Energy Global plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DUK Duke Energy Corporation	3.24%	3.60%	3.84%	4.18%	3.86%	3.72%	4.17%	4.11%	4.21%	4.15%	4.33%	4.54%

Drawdowns

RNW vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNW drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNW and DUK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNW	DUK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-71.92%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.05%	-10.88%	-34.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.24%	-24.16%	-40.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.93%	-1.89%	-60.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.19%	-10.88%	-31.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.13%	4.63%	+14.50%

Volatility

RNW vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 4.40%. This indicates that RNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNW	DUK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.03%	4.40%	+3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.95%	10.47%	+26.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.50%	16.12%	+23.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.68%	17.76%	+28.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.37%	20.36%	+26.01%

Financials

RNW vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ReNew Energy Global plc and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RNW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a gross profit of 14.35B and revenue of 25.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.6%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.60B and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.

RNW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported an operating income of 9.33B and revenue of 25.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.13B and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

RNW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a net income of -199.65M and revenue of 25.35B, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.