PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNW vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNW vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNW achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 33.22% return.


RNW

1D
1.74%
1M
8.61%
YTD
13.81%
6M
17.55%
1Y
-1.83%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*

ANET

1D
2.88%
1M
13.33%
YTD
33.22%
6M
33.53%
1Y
102.39%
3Y*
67.41%
5Y*
50.26%
10Y*
45.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNW vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RNW
ReNew Energy Global plc
13.81%-17.28%-10.84%39.27%-29.31%-29.27%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
33.22%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%86.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RNW and ANET is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNW:

$2.38B

ANET:

$222.35B

EPS

RNW:

₹28.22

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

RNW:

21.49

ANET:

59.79

PEG Ratio

RNW:

0.09

ANET:

1.40

PS Ratio

RNW:

1.68

ANET:

22.91

PB Ratio

RNW:

1.82

ANET:

16.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNW:

₹132.90B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNW:

₹93.10B

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNW:

₹88.90B

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNW vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNW
RNW Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNW Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNW vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNWANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.31

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.63

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

7.56

-7.64

RNW vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNW and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNW vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNW drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNW and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-52.20%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.05%

-28.33%

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.05%

-50.42%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.24%

-50.42%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.55%

-1.78%

-44.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.64%

-15.37%

-27.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.56%

13.59%

+10.97%

Volatility

RNW vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW) is 11.16%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that RNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

15.95%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.22%

40.27%

-17.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.70%

53.18%

-12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.35%

47.31%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.04%

45.04%

+1.00%

Dividends

RNW vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither RNW nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RNW vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ReNew Energy Global plc and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
32.29B
2.71B
(RNW) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RNW values in INR, ANET values in USD

RNW vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ReNew Energy Global plc and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.9%
61.9%
Portfolio components
RNW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a gross profit of 15.78B and revenue of 32.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

RNW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported an operating income of 9.55B and revenue of 32.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

RNW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ReNew Energy Global plc reported a net income of 789.09M and revenue of 32.29B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNW and ANET have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to RNW (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNW dropped -64.92% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNW and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer