PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNST vs. MOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNST vs. MOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renasant Corporation (RNST) and Momo Inc. (MOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNST achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than MOMO's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RNST has outperformed MOMO with an annualized return of 5.67%, while MOMO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.55% annualized return.


RNST

1D
1.52%
1M
4.87%
YTD
22.87%
6M
19.87%
1Y
23.47%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
5.67%

MOMO

1D
0.54%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-11.24%
1Y
-30.79%
3Y*
-10.08%
5Y*
-11.09%
10Y*
-1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNST vs. MOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNST
Renasant Corporation
22.87%0.98%9.12%-7.70%1.70%15.28%-1.62%20.24%-24.72%-1.43%
MOMO
Momo Inc.
-11.24%-10.17%21.75%-15.26%12.98%-32.96%-56.80%43.24%-2.98%33.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RNST and MOMO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.19

The correlation between RNST and MOMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNST:

$4.03B

MOMO:

$891.67M

EPS

RNST:

$2.40

MOMO:

CN¥4.44

PE Ratio

RNST:

17.81

MOMO:

8.46

PS Ratio

RNST:

2.84

MOMO:

0.61

PB Ratio

RNST:

1.04

MOMO:

0.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNST:

$1.43B

MOMO:

CN¥10.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNST:

$614.94M

MOMO:

CN¥3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNST:

$182.62M

MOMO:

CN¥1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNST vs. MOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNST
RNST Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNST Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNST Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MOMO
MOMO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNST vs. MOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renasant Corporation (RNST) and Momo Inc. (MOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNSTMOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.83

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.82

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

-1.24

+4.29

RNST vs. MOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the MOMO Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNST and MOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNST vs. MOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNST drawdown since its inception was -73.06%, smaller than the maximum MOMO drawdown of -90.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNST and MOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNSTMOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.06%

-90.31%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.19%

-37.52%

+20.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.28%

-50.91%

+21.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-70.18%

+29.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.84%

-90.31%

+30.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-83.00%

+83.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-54.51%

+35.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

24.93%

-17.22%

Volatility

RNST vs. MOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Renasant Corporation (RNST) is 6.68%, while Momo Inc. (MOMO) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that RNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNSTMOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

9.65%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.53%

20.67%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.64%

28.55%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.13%

61.69%

-30.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

59.50%

-26.75%

Dividends

RNST vs. MOMO - Dividend Comparison

RNST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than MOMO's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOMO
Momo Inc.
5.05%4.58%7.00%10.36%7.13%7.13%5.44%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
2.15%2.53%2.46%2.61%2.34%2.32%2.61%2.46%2.65%1.79%1.68%1.98%

Financials

RNST vs. MOMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Renasant Corporation and Momo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
338.12M
2.37B
(RNST) Total Revenue
(MOMO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RNST values in USD, MOMO values in CNY

RNST vs. MOMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Renasant Corporation and Momo Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
38.7%
Portfolio components
RNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 338.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MOMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.07M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

RNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 338.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MOMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported an operating income of 295.46M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

RNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a net income of 88.23M and revenue of 338.12M, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.

MOMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported a net income of 289.29M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNST and MOMO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOMO has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to RNST (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNST dropped -73.06% vs MOMO's -90.31%.

RNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNST and MOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer