PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNST vs. OWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNST vs. OWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renasant Corporation (RNST) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNST achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than OWL's -32.30% return.


RNST

1D
-2.47%
1M
0.03%
YTD
12.65%
6M
11.20%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
3.94%

OWL

1D
-3.77%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-32.30%
6M
-35.41%
1Y
-44.58%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-2.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNST vs. OWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RNST
Renasant Corporation
12.65%0.98%9.12%-7.70%1.70%15.28%0.05%
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
-32.30%-32.83%61.76%47.40%-26.29%32.18%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RNST and OWL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNST:

$3.71B

OWL:

$6.60B

EPS

RNST:

$2.40

OWL:

$0.13

PE Ratio

RNST:

16.42

OWL:

74.56

PS Ratio

RNST:

2.62

OWL:

2.20

PB Ratio

RNST:

0.96

OWL:

3.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNST:

$1.43B

OWL:

$2.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNST:

$614.94M

OWL:

$1.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNST:

$182.62M

OWL:

$876.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNST vs. OWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNST
RNST Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNST Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNST Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

OWL
OWL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNST vs. OWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renasant Corporation (RNST) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNSTOWLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

-1.03

+1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

-1.57

+2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.82

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.76

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.88

-1.38

+3.26

RNST vs. OWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNST Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the OWL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNST and OWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNSTOWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-1.03

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.07

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.07

+0.19

Drawdowns

RNST vs. OWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNST drawdown since its inception was -73.06%, which is greater than OWL's maximum drawdown of -67.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNST and OWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNSTOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.06%

-67.10%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.19%

-58.59%

+41.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.28%

-67.10%

+37.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.73%

-67.10%

+24.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-60.35%

+55.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-23.95%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

32.34%

-24.60%

Volatility

RNST vs. OWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Renasant Corporation (RNST) is 6.99%, while Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that RNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNSTOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

13.25%

-6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

34.47%

-16.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.73%

43.25%

-16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.25%

43.40%

-12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.83%

42.69%

-9.86%

Dividends

RNST vs. OWL - Dividend Comparison

RNST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than OWL's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
9.34%5.72%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
2.28%2.53%2.46%2.61%2.34%2.32%2.61%2.46%2.65%1.79%1.68%1.98%

Financials

RNST vs. OWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Renasant Corporation and Blue Owl Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
338.12M
753.81M
(RNST) Total Revenue
(OWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNST vs. OWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Renasant Corporation and Blue Owl Capital Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
100.0%
Portfolio components
RNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 338.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

OWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 753.81M and revenue of 753.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 338.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

OWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 109.49M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

RNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a net income of 88.23M and revenue of 338.12M, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.

OWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a net income of 15.54M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNST and OWL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWL has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to RNST (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNST dropped -73.06% vs OWL's -67.10%.

RNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNST and OWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer