RNIN vs. TMDV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) and TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. RNIN is actively managed, while TMDV is passively managed. Over the past year, RNIN returned 41.34% vs 16.28% for TMDV. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RNIN charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TMDV.

Performance

RNIN vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNIN achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 14.01% return.

RNIN

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 8.28%
• 6M: 27.27%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.34%

TMDV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 7.77%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 16.28%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	$576.14K	$321.31K	$205.27K
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	$1.26K	$6.62K	$8.23K

RNIN vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	30.02%	10.92%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	14.01%	3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RNIN and TMDV is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.61

The correlation between RNIN and TMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RNIN vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 94
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 48
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNIN vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNIN	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.27	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.99	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.22	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.90	1.61	+5.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.80	3.89	+19.91

RNIN vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNIN and TMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNIN vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNIN drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNIN and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNIN	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-33.42%	+27.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-9.82%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-1.89%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-5.35%	+4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	4.06%	-2.41%

Volatility

RNIN vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 4.97%. This indicates that RNIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNIN	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	4.97%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	9.42%	+2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.08%	12.51%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	14.52%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	18.56%	-2.82%

RNIN vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNIN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNIN vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

RNIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than TMDV's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.80%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.46%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNIN and TMDV in my portfolio?

RNIN and TMDV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNIN or TMDV?

RNIN has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to TMDV (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNIN dropped -5.70% vs TMDV's -33.42%.

Which ETF is better, RNIN or TMDV?

On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 41.34% vs 16.28% for TMDV. On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNIN or TMDV?

Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 41.34% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNIN or TMDV?

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNIN or TMDV?

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.80% for RNIN.

What is the main difference between RNIN and TMDV?

They also come from different issuers: Bushido and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RNIN and 0.35% for TMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.