PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNG vs. ROKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNG vs. ROKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNG achieves a 93.23% return, which is significantly higher than ROKU's 33.66% return.


RNG

1D
4.00%
1M
39.02%
6M
115.63%
YTD
93.23%
1Y
136.16%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
-26.90%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

ROKU

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.81%
6M
52.32%
YTD
33.66%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
-19.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.64M$110.87M$87.41M
$351.29M$393.75M$580.85M

RNG vs. ROKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
93.23%-17.51%3.12%-4.10%-81.10%-50.56%124.68%104.60%70.33%19.80%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
33.66%45.94%-18.90%125.21%-82.16%-31.27%147.96%337.01%-40.83%228.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RNG and ROKU is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.50

The correlation between RNG and ROKU shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNG:

$4.80B

ROKU:

$21.51B

EPS

RNG:

$1.25

ROKU:

$1.33

PE Ratio

RNG:

44.65

ROKU:

108.85

PS Ratio

RNG:

1.91

ROKU:

4.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNG:

$2.58B

ROKU:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNG:

$1.86B

ROKU:

$2.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNG:

$300.06M

ROKU:

$280.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNG vs. ROKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNG
RNG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKU
ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNG vs. ROKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNGROKUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

1.96

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

5.65

+3.77

RNG vs. ROKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the ROKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNG and ROKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNG vs. ROKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNG drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, roughly equal to the maximum ROKU drawdown of -91.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNG and ROKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNGROKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.15%

-91.91%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.32%

-27.69%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.57%

-51.65%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.36%

-90.77%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.41%

-69.76%

-17.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.86%

-53.10%

+10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

9.83%

+2.86%

Volatility

RNG vs. ROKU - Volatility Comparison

RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a higher volatility of 28.56% compared to Roku, Inc. (ROKU) at 3.43%. This indicates that RNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNGROKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.56%

3.43%

+25.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.45%

34.40%

+25.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.16%

46.83%

+28.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.53%

66.52%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.51%

74.91%

-18.40%

Dividends

RNG vs. ROKU - Dividend Comparison

RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ROKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
0.27%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
0.00%

Financials

RNG vs. ROKU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RingCentral, Inc. and Roku, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RNG vs. ROKU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RingCentral, Inc. and Roku, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 472.31M and revenue of 657.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.

ROKU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.29M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

ROKU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 39.12M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

ROKU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNG and ROKU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNG has higher volatility (28.56%) compared to ROKU (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNG dropped -95.15% vs ROKU's -91.91%.

RNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNG and ROKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer