PortfoliosLab logo
RNG vs. FSLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RNG and FSLY is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RNG vs. FSLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RNG:

-0.57

FSLY:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

RNG:

-0.76

FSLY:

0.19

Omega Ratio

RNG:

0.91

FSLY:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

RNG:

-0.30

FSLY:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

RNG:

-1.27

FSLY:

-0.56

Ulcer Index

RNG:

22.52%

FSLY:

26.85%

Daily Std Dev

RNG:

44.14%

FSLY:

71.53%

Max Drawdown

RNG:

-95.15%

FSLY:

-96.12%

Current Drawdown

RNG:

-94.01%

FSLY:

-94.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNG:

$2.37B

FSLY:

$1.06B

EPS

RNG:

-$0.43

FSLY:

-$1.09

PS Ratio

RNG:

0.98

FSLY:

1.91

PB Ratio

RNG:

102.83

FSLY:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNG:

$2.43B

FSLY:

$554.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNG:

$1.71B

FSLY:

$295.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

RNG:

$208.73M

FSLY:

-$69.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNG achieves a -24.16% return, which is significantly lower than FSLY's -21.19% return.


RNG

YTD

-24.16%

1M

15.94%

6M

-23.86%

1Y

-25.00%

3Y*

-24.68%

5Y*

-36.71%

10Y*

4.61%

FSLY

YTD

-21.19%

1M

38.81%

6M

-2.23%

1Y

-15.26%

3Y*

-14.37%

5Y*

-28.95%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RingCentral, Inc.

Fastly, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNG vs. FSLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNG is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNG is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNG is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNG is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNG is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNG is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSLY is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSLY is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSLY is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSLY is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSLY is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSLY is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RNG vs. FSLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the FSLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNG and FSLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RNG vs. FSLY - Dividend Comparison

Neither RNG nor FSLY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RNG vs. FSLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNG drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLY drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNG and FSLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RNG vs. FSLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) is 9.92%, while Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) has a volatility of 26.09%. This indicates that RNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RNG vs. FSLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RingCentral, Inc. and Fastly, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
612.06M
144.47M
(RNG) Total Revenue
(FSLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNG vs. FSLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RingCentral, Inc. and Fastly, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
70.5%
53.2%
(RNG) Gross Margin
(FSLY) Gross Margin
RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 431.61M and revenue of 612.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

FSLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastly, Inc. reported a gross profit of 76.80M and revenue of 144.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.34M and revenue of 612.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.

FSLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastly, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.18M and revenue of 144.47M, resulting in an operating margin of -26.4%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of -10.33M and revenue of 612.06M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.

FSLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastly, Inc. reported a net income of -39.15M and revenue of 144.47M, resulting in a net margin of -27.1%.