PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNG vs. ALRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNG vs. ALRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNG achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than ALRM's -14.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RNG having a 5.73% annualized return and ALRM not far ahead at 5.74%.


RNG

1D
-0.51%
1M
-19.86%
YTD
21.04%
6M
17.85%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-34.83%
10Y*
5.73%

ALRM

1D
-1.53%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-14.35%
6M
-16.41%
1Y
-22.20%
3Y*
-3.41%
5Y*
-12.10%
10Y*
5.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNG vs. ALRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
21.04%-17.51%3.12%-4.10%-81.10%-50.56%124.68%104.60%70.33%134.95%
ALRM
Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
-14.35%-16.09%-5.91%30.60%-41.66%-18.02%140.75%-17.16%37.40%35.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RNG and ALRM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.45

The correlation between RNG and ALRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNG:

$3.03B

ALRM:

$2.46B

EPS

RNG:

$0.94

ALRM:

$2.22

PE Ratio

RNG:

37.15

ALRM:

19.73

PS Ratio

RNG:

1.23

ALRM:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNG:

$2.55B

ALRM:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNG:

$1.82B

ALRM:

$729.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

RNG:

$364.66M

ALRM:

$212.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNG vs. ALRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNG
RNG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ALRM
ALRM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ALRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ALRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALRM Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNG vs. ALRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNGALRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.89

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

-0.77

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

-1.32

+3.96

RNG vs. ALRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the ALRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNG and ALRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNG vs. ALRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNG drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, which is greater than ALRM's maximum drawdown of -60.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNG and ALRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNGALRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.15%

-60.88%

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.93%

-28.79%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.86%

-44.34%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.99%

-53.33%

-39.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.15%

-60.88%

-34.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.11%

-59.42%

-32.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-28.32%

-14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

16.87%

-5.15%

Volatility

RNG vs. ALRM - Volatility Comparison

RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a higher volatility of 19.04% compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) at 6.14%. This indicates that RNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNGALRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.04%

6.14%

+12.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.10%

22.94%

+30.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.89%

30.20%

+38.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.09%

34.16%

+28.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.67%

37.38%

+18.29%

Dividends

RNG vs. ALRM - Dividend Comparison

RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while ALRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM
ALRM
Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
0.00%
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
0.43%

Financials

RNG vs. ALRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RingCentral, Inc. and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
644.20M
265.19M
(RNG) Total Revenue
(ALRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNG vs. ALRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RingCentral, Inc. and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
72.2%
89.5%
Portfolio components
RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 464.77M and revenue of 644.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.2%.

ALRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.30M and revenue of 265.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.5%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.03M and revenue of 644.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.

ALRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.64M and revenue of 265.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 30.62M and revenue of 644.20M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

ALRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 23.58M and revenue of 265.19M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNG and ALRM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNG has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to ALRM (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNG dropped -95.15% vs ALRM's -60.88%.

RNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNG and ALRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer