RNG vs. ALRM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM).

Performance

RNG vs. ALRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RNG vs. ALRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	32.27%	-17.51%	3.12%	-4.10%	-81.10%	-50.56%	124.68%	104.60%	70.33%	134.95%
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.	-15.13%	-16.09%	-5.91%	30.60%	-41.66%	-18.02%	140.75%	-17.16%	37.40%	35.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RNG : $3.35B ALRM : $2.45B
EPS RNG : $0.48 ALRM : $2.27
PE Ratio RNG : 79.90 ALRM : 19.07
PS Ratio RNG : 1.38 ALRM : 2.50
Total Revenue (TTM) RNG : $2.52B ALRM : $1.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) RNG : $1.79B ALRM : $914.99M
EBITDA (TTM) RNG : $331.71M ALRM : $216.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNG achieves a 32.27% return, which is significantly higher than ALRM's -15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RNG has outperformed ALRM with an annualized return of 9.13%, while ALRM has yielded a comparatively lower 6.43% annualized return.

RNG

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 32.27%
• 6M: 35.89%
• 1Y: 50.62%
• 3Y*: 7.59%
• 5Y*: -34.00%
• 10Y*: 9.13%

ALRM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -8.80%
• YTD: -15.13%
• 6M: -16.63%
• 1Y: -22.44%
• 3Y*: -4.86%
• 5Y*: -13.13%
• 10Y*: 6.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RNG vs. ALRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNG

RNG Risk / Return Rank: 73
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ALRM

ALRM Risk / Return Rank: 11
ALRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ALRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ALRM Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ALRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ALRM Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNG vs. ALRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNG	ALRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	-0.75	+1.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	-1.00	+2.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.88	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	-0.73	+3.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	-1.53	+6.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNG vs. ALRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the ALRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNG and ALRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNG	ALRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	-0.75	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.55	-0.39	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.17	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.24	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between RNG and ALRM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RNG vs. ALRM - Dividend Comparison

RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while ALRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	0.20%
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.	0.00%

Drawdowns

RNG vs. ALRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNG drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, which is greater than ALRM's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNG and ALRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNG	ALRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.15%	-60.68%	-34.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.49%	-30.22%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.49%	-55.54%	-37.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.15%	-60.68%	-34.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.38%	-59.79%	-31.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-27.72%	-13.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.54%	14.53%	-3.99%

Volatility

RNG vs. ALRM - Volatility Comparison

RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) at 7.73%. This indicates that RNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNG	ALRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.76%	7.73%	+8.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.08%	21.14%	+24.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.63%	29.92%	+34.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.12%	33.99%	+28.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.95%	37.62%	+17.33%

Financials