PortfoliosLab logo
RNG vs. ZM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RNG and ZM is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RNG vs. ZM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RNG:

-0.61

ZM:

0.89

Sortino Ratio

RNG:

-0.62

ZM:

1.45

Omega Ratio

RNG:

0.92

ZM:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

RNG:

-0.27

ZM:

0.33

Martin Ratio

RNG:

-1.11

ZM:

3.07

Ulcer Index

RNG:

22.82%

ZM:

9.76%

Daily Std Dev

RNG:

44.00%

ZM:

33.69%

Max Drawdown

RNG:

-95.15%

ZM:

-90.27%

Current Drawdown

RNG:

-93.83%

ZM:

-85.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNG:

$2.47B

ZM:

$25.40B

EPS

RNG:

-$0.43

ZM:

$3.21

PEG Ratio

RNG:

0.27

ZM:

2.71

PS Ratio

RNG:

1.02

ZM:

5.44

PB Ratio

RNG:

102.83

ZM:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNG:

$2.43B

ZM:

$3.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNG:

$1.71B

ZM:

$2.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNG:

$208.73M

ZM:

$639.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNG achieves a -21.91% return, which is significantly lower than ZM's 1.83% return.


RNG

YTD

-21.91%

1M

20.07%

6M

-23.12%

1Y

-26.56%

3Y*

-24.84%

5Y*

-36.29%

10Y*

4.92%

ZM

YTD

1.83%

1M

16.24%

6M

6.88%

1Y

29.66%

3Y*

-2.53%

5Y*

-13.54%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RingCentral, Inc.

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNG vs. ZM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNG is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNG is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNG is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNG is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNG is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNG is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ZM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZM is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZM is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZM is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZM is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RNG vs. ZM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) and Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the ZM Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNG and ZM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RNG vs. ZM - Dividend Comparison

Neither RNG nor ZM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RNG vs. ZM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNG drawdown since its inception was -95.15%, which is greater than ZM's maximum drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNG and ZM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RNG vs. ZM - Volatility Comparison

RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) at 5.05%. This indicates that RNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RNG vs. ZM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RingCentral, Inc. and Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
612.06M
1.18B
(RNG) Total Revenue
(ZM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNG vs. ZM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RingCentral, Inc. and Zoom Video Communications, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%74.0%76.0%20212022202320242025
70.5%
75.7%
(RNG) Gross Margin
(ZM) Gross Margin
RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 431.61M and revenue of 612.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

ZM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a gross profit of 896.78M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.34M and revenue of 612.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.

ZM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported an operating income of 225.06M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of -10.33M and revenue of 612.06M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.

ZM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a net income of 367.87M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.