PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNEM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNEM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


RNEM

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.04%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNEM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
-0.17%15.58%-1.47%23.43%-8.75%6.16%-8.16%12.76%-9.34%11.97%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RNEM and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017

0.50

The correlation between RNEM and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNEM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNEM
VOO

Financial Services

34.7%
11.6%

Basic Materials

13.7%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Communication Services

9.1%
11.3%

Energy

7.6%
3.5%

Technology

6.0%
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.6%
8.5%

Industrials

4.1%
8.3%

Utilities

3.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Financial Services

RNEM
34.7%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

RNEM
13.7%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RNEM
10.1%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

RNEM
9.1%
VOO
11.3%

Energy

RNEM
7.6%
VOO
3.5%

Technology

RNEM
6.0%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

RNEM
5.9%
VOO
4.9%

Healthcare

RNEM
4.6%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

RNEM
4.1%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

RNEM
3.7%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

RNEM
0.8%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNEM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNEM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNEMVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

2.53

-2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

3.43

-2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.46

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.42

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.18

15.95

-14.77

RNEM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNEMVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.53

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.85

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.89

-0.65

Drawdowns

RNEM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNEMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-33.99%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-8.90%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-18.69%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-24.52%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

0.00%

-6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-3.69%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

1.91%

+2.66%

Volatility

RNEM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that RNEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNEMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.74%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

8.88%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

11.78%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

16.81%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

18.01%

-0.79%

RNEM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNEM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.75%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNEM and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNEM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 4.16% for RNEM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

RNEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNEM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer