PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNDV vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNDV vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than THLV's 9.49% return.


RNDV

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.04%
YTD
16.69%
6M
16.73%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

THLV

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.27%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.41%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNDV vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
16.69%14.27%11.05%9.77%2.92%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
9.49%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RNDV and THLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022

0.81

The correlation between RNDV and THLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNDV vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNDV
THLV

Technology

34.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

13.6%
12.5%

Financial Services

10.7%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
15.7%

Industrials

9.4%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
13.7%

Energy

5.0%
17.5%

Communication Services

4.8%
0.1%

Utilities

2.6%
14.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
14.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
12.2%

Technology

RNDV
34.0%
THLV
15.7%

Healthcare

RNDV
13.6%
THLV
12.5%

Financial Services

RNDV
10.7%
THLV
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RNDV
9.7%
THLV
15.7%

Industrials

RNDV
9.4%
THLV
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

RNDV
5.8%
THLV
13.7%

Energy

RNDV
5.0%
THLV
17.5%

Communication Services

RNDV
4.8%
THLV
0.1%

Utilities

RNDV
2.6%
THLV
14.7%

Real Estate

RNDV
2.4%
THLV
14.3%

Basic Materials

RNDV
1.7%
THLV
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNDV vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNDV
RNDV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RNDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RNDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNDV vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNDVTHLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.76

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

8.38

+2.97

RNDV vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNDV and THLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNDVTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.87

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.88

-0.27

Drawdowns

RNDV vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and THLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNDVTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-13.15%

-24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-6.66%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-13.15%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.99%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-3.74%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.19%

+0.60%

Volatility

RNDV vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.45%. This indicates that RNDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNDVTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.45%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

7.48%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

9.84%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

11.73%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

11.73%

+7.14%

RNDV vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNDV vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than THLV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
2.33%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.62%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNDV and THLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNDV has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to THLV (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs THLV's -13.15%.

On 3-year performance, RNDV leads with 17.67% vs 12.59% for THLV. On fees, RNDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RNDV has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.62% for THLV.

RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.64% for THLV.

RNDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNDV and THLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer