RNDV vs. DFND
RNDV (US Equity Dividend Select ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - RNDV tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNDV returned 9.28%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
RNDV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RNDV
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
RNDV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 16.69% | 14.27% | 11.05% | 9.77% | -7.55% | 28.99% | 5.51% | 27.34% | -7.11% | 9.90% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNDV and DFND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RNDV and DFND has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RNDV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RNDV
DFND
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
RNDV
DFND
Healthcare
RNDV
DFND
Financial Services
RNDV
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
RNDV
DFND
Industrials
RNDV
DFND
Consumer Defensive
RNDV
DFND
Energy
RNDV
DFND
Communication Services
RNDV
DFND
Utilities
RNDV
DFND
-
Real Estate
RNDV
DFND
Basic Materials
RNDV
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNDV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
RNDV
DFND
RNDV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.02 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 0.07 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 0.13 | +11.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 0.02 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.21 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.36 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
RNDV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.44% | -22.65% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -3.44% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.70% | -12.56% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -22.65% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -3.69% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -5.70% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.70% | -0.91% |
Volatility
RNDV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that RNDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 0.00% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 6.16% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 10.92% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 22.46% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 19.09% | -0.22% |
RNDV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNDV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF | 2.33% | 2.70% | 2.55% | 3.10% | 2.52% | 1.95% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 4.09% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNDV and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNDV has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 5-year performance, RNDV leads with 9.28% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, RNDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RNDV has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RNDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 1.50% for DFND.
RNDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNDV and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer