PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEPIX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a 54.92% return, which is significantly higher than RMQAX's 38.84% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPIX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 30.98%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.


TEPIX

1D
3.70%
1M
32.32%
YTD
54.92%
6M
53.70%
1Y
108.49%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
30.98%

RMQAX

1D
1.16%
1M
19.81%
YTD
38.84%
6M
35.01%
1Y
84.61%
3Y*
50.71%
5Y*
26.56%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
54.92%30.08%14.17%91.81%-51.01%46.85%64.53%71.30%-5.89%49.17%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
38.84%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TEPIX and RMQAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.96

The correlation between TEPIX and RMQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEPIX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEPIX
TEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.56

2.73

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.18

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

3.48

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.25

12.60

+1.64

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEPIX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

2.73

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.58

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.81

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.75

-0.60

Drawdowns

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.14%

-63.18%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-24.96%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.97%

-42.45%

-42.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.97%

-63.18%

-21.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.97%

-63.18%

-21.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.49%

0.00%

-54.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.78%

-12.91%

-36.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

6.89%

+0.84%

Volatility

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) at 8.62%. This indicates that TEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

8.62%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.04%

24.34%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.40%

32.21%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.10%

46.18%

+98.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.51%

46.42%

+59.09%

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than RMQAX's 26.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
26.12%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
2.08%3.22%0.00%0.37%0.00%0.90%2.31%0.00%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TEPIX and RMQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEPIX has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to RMQAX (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEPIX dropped -89.14% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

TEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEPIX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer