PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEPIX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a 29.95% return, which is significantly higher than RMQAX's 16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPIX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.71% annualized return.


TEPIX

1D
8.28%
1M
-4.69%
6M
30.55%
YTD
29.95%
1Y
51.61%
3Y*
-18.95%
5Y*
-12.90%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
4.22%

RMQAX

1D
7.48%
1M
-8.91%
6M
13.97%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
35.28%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
33.71%
ALL TIME*
31.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
29.95%30.08%-71.46%91.81%-51.01%46.85%64.53%71.30%-5.89%49.17%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
16.20%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TEPIX and RMQAX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.96

The correlation between TEPIX and RMQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEPIX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEPIX
TEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEPIXRMQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.31

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

4.05

+0.80

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEPIX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.14%

-63.18%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-24.96%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.79%

-42.45%

-43.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.79%

-63.18%

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.79%

-63.18%

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.89%

-17.08%

-46.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.94%

-12.85%

-37.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.33%

8.04%

+1.29%

Volatility

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) have volatilities of 14.74% and 14.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEPIXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

14.58%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.89%

32.55%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.48%

39.23%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.84%

47.24%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.79%

46.82%

-2.03%

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEPIX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than RMQAX's 31.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
31.21%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%
TEPIX
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund
2.48%3.22%0.00%0.37%0.00%0.90%2.31%0.00%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TEPIX and RMQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEPIX has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to RMQAX (14.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEPIX dropped -89.14% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

TEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEPIX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer