TEPIX vs. RMQAX

In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's -0.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEPIX having a 29.32% annualized return and RMQAX not far behind at 28.95%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEPIX and RMQAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than RMQAX's 26.14% yield.

The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and RMQAX.

The current volatility for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) is 9.56%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that TEPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.