TEPIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
TEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | -12.41% | 30.08% | 14.17% | 91.81% | -51.01% | 46.85% | 64.53% | 71.30% | -5.89% | 49.17% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPIX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 23.33%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.95% annualized return.
TEPIX
- 1D
- 6.36%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -11.70%
- 1Y
- 36.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEPIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
TEPIX
SCHG
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.24 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.09 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 3.71 | +1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.57 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.79 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEPIX and SCHG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | 3.68% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.14% | -34.59% | -54.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -16.41% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.97% | -34.59% | -50.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.97% | -34.59% | -50.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.27% | -12.51% | -61.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -5.22% | -44.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.94% | 4.84% | +3.10% |
Volatility
TEPIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that TEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 6.77% | +5.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.81% | 12.54% | +12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.73% | 22.45% | +18.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.06% | 22.31% | +122.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.42% | 21.51% | +83.91% |