RMQHX vs. RYNVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. RYNVX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Jul 11, 1993.
Performance
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
RYNVX Rydex Nova Fund | -7.55% | 21.42% | 33.14% | 35.31% | -29.96% | 42.56% | 19.64% | 45.58% | -10.24% | 31.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than RYNVX's -7.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed RYNVX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while RYNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.69% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
RYNVX
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -7.55%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 16.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than RYNVX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. RYNVX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
RYNVX
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | RYNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.26 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.25 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.59 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | RYNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.50 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.61 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.39 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and RYNVX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than RYNVX's 0.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYNVX Rydex Nova Fund | 0.82% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.59% | 22.11% | 9.07% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.97% | 1.22% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum RYNVX drawdown of -76.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and RYNVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | RYNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -76.54% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -17.91% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -40.92% | -22.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -48.58% | -14.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -10.09% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -19.72% | +6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 3.99% | +3.32% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. RYNVX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) at 8.01%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | RYNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 8.01% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 14.28% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 27.47% | +20.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 25.96% | +20.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 27.36% | +19.00% |