RYNVX vs. ULPIX

In the year-to-date period, RYNVX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than ULPIX's -2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RYNVX has underperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RYNVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RYNVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is comparable to the ULPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYNVX and ULPIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RYNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than ULPIX's 3.15% yield.

The maximum RYNVX drawdown since its inception was -76.54%, smaller than the maximum ULPIX drawdown of -89.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYNVX and ULPIX.

The current volatility for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) is 7.13%, while ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that RYNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.