RMQHX vs. PMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. PMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002.
Performance
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 9.64% | 273.51% | 5.35% | -1.78% | -20.47% | -14.71% | 28.27% | 72.99% | -21.10% | 6.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than PMPIX's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed PMPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while PMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.11% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
PMPIX
- 1D
- 10.07%
- 1M
- -28.95%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 25.93%
- 1Y
- 162.99%
- 3Y*
- 55.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than PMPIX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. PMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
PMPIX
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 2.42 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.45 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.00 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 13.58 | -7.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.42 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.34 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.08 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and PMPIX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than PMPIX's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% |
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 0.39% | 0.43% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum PMPIX drawdown of -94.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and PMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -94.34% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -41.66% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -61.05% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -65.94% | +2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -36.81% | +17.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -59.85% | +46.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 12.27% | -4.96% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. PMPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) is 13.71%, while ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a volatility of 26.22%. This indicates that RMQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 26.22% | -12.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 56.77% | -30.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 67.99% | -20.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 52.25% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 52.91% | -6.55% |