PMPIX vs. VTV
PMPIX (ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both funds - PMPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX returned 12.33%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for VTV. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMPIX charges 1.53%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
PMPIX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMPIX achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 12.33%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
PMPIX
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -15.36%
- 1Y
- 84.62%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
PMPIX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | -8.35% | 273.51% | 5.35% | -1.78% | -20.47% | -14.71% | 28.27% | 72.99% | -21.10% | 6.55% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 15.12% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMPIX and VTV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.28 |
The correlation between PMPIX and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMPIX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
PMPIX
VTV
PMPIX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMPIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 4.56 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 17.20 | -12.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMPIX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMPIX and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMPIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -59.27% | -35.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.65% | -6.35% | -43.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -14.52% | -35.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.05% | -17.04% | -44.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.94% | -36.78% | -29.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.18% | 0.00% | -47.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.66% | -7.85% | -51.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.25% | 1.68% | +17.57% |
Volatility
PMPIX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a higher volatility of 24.57% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.32%. This indicates that PMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMPIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.57% | 3.32% | +21.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.87% | 7.82% | +50.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.58% | 10.39% | +59.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.64% | 13.88% | +39.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.84% | 16.69% | +36.15% |
PMPIX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMPIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMPIX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
PMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VTV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 0.47% | 0.43% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMPIX and VTV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMPIX has higher volatility (24.57%) compared to VTV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMPIX dropped -94.34% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMPIX and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer