PMPIX vs. VTV

In the year-to-date period, PMPIX achieves a 71.22% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 7.10%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PMPIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMPIX and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than VTV's 2.29% yield.

The maximum PMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.11%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMPIX and VTV.

ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a higher volatility of 19.43% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 4.23%. This indicates that PMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.