PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMPIX vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMPIX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMPIX achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 12.33%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.


PMPIX

1D
-3.50%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-8.35%
6M
-15.36%
1Y
84.62%
3Y*
51.07%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
12.33%

VTV

1D
0.99%
1M
3.67%
YTD
15.12%
6M
14.64%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMPIX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMPIX
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund
-8.35%273.51%5.35%-1.78%-20.47%-14.71%28.27%72.99%-21.10%6.55%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
15.12%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PMPIX and VTV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.28

The correlation between PMPIX and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMPIX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMPIX
PMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMPIX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMPIXVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.50

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

4.56

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

17.20

-12.92

PMPIX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMPIX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMPIX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMPIX and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMPIXVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.34%

-59.27%

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.65%

-6.35%

-43.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-14.52%

-35.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.05%

-17.04%

-44.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.94%

-36.78%

-29.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.18%

0.00%

-47.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.66%

-7.85%

-51.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.25%

1.68%

+17.57%

Volatility

PMPIX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a higher volatility of 24.57% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.32%. This indicates that PMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMPIXVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.57%

3.32%

+21.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.87%

7.82%

+50.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.58%

10.39%

+59.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.64%

13.88%

+39.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.84%

16.69%

+36.15%

PMPIX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMPIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMPIX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

PMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VTV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMPIX
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund
0.47%0.43%1.89%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.82%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMPIX and VTV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMPIX has higher volatility (24.57%) compared to VTV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMPIX dropped -94.34% vs VTV's -59.27%.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMPIX and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer