RMQHX vs. INPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. INPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | -20.03% | 9.88% | 41.50% | 76.21% | -63.24% | -1.09% | 254.85% | 25.95% | 4.78% | 44.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly higher than INPIX's -20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed INPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while INPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.82% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
INPIX
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -20.03%
- 6M
- -24.79%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.70%
- 10Y*
- 20.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than INPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. INPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
INPIX
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.06 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.36 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.04 | +1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 0.12 | +5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.06 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | -0.14 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.42 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.10 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and INPIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, while INPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 21.43% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 6.69% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum INPIX drawdown of -95.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and INPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -95.64% | +32.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -32.04% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -73.41% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -73.41% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -37.21% | +17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -46.38% | +33.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 11.82% | -4.51% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. INPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) at 10.98%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 10.98% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 22.50% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 36.60% | +11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 41.13% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 49.65% | -3.29% |