INPIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
INPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
INPIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INPIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | -20.03% | 9.88% | 41.50% | 76.21% | -63.24% | -1.09% | 254.85% | 25.95% | 4.78% | 44.61% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INPIX achieves a -20.03% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, INPIX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 20.82%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.95% annualized return.
INPIX
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -20.03%
- 6M
- -24.79%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.70%
- 10Y*
- 20.82%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INPIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INPIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
INPIX
SCHG
INPIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 0.76 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 1.24 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.09 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | 3.71 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 0.76 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.57 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.79 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between INPIX and SCHG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
INPIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
INPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 21.43% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 6.69% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
INPIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INPIX drawdown since its inception was -95.64%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.64% | -34.59% | -61.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.04% | -16.41% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.41% | -34.59% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.41% | -34.59% | -38.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.21% | -12.51% | -24.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.38% | -5.22% | -41.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 4.84% | +6.98% |
Volatility
INPIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that INPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.98% | 6.77% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 12.54% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.60% | 22.45% | +14.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.13% | 22.31% | +18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.65% | 21.51% | +28.14% |