RMQHX vs. GIBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. GIBIX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 30, 2011.
Performance
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | -0.52% | 8.22% | 3.18% | 7.45% | -16.38% | -0.58% | 14.94% | 4.45% | 0.89% | 6.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than GIBIX's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed GIBIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while GIBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
GIBIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GIBIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. GIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
GIBIX
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | GIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.57 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.92 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.96 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | GIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.10 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.92 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and GIBIX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than GIBIX's 4.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | 4.66% | 5.03% | 4.71% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.36% | 4.80% | 2.38% | 3.25% | 3.38% | 4.68% | 4.39% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than GIBIX's maximum drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and GIBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | GIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -21.44% | -41.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -2.99% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -21.44% | -41.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -21.44% | -41.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -2.30% | -17.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -3.44% | -9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 0.96% | +6.35% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. GIBIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) at 1.58%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | GIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 1.58% | +12.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 2.54% | +23.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 4.34% | +43.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 5.81% | +40.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 4.74% | +41.62% |