GIBIX vs. SRBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX).
GIBIX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. SRBFX is managed by Columbia Threadneedle. It was launched on Dec 5, 1978.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIBIX or SRBFX.
Key characteristics
| GIBIX | SRBFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.98% | 2.31% |
| 1Y Return | 9.47% | 9.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.35% | -3.00% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.79% | -0.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.32% | 1.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 1.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.30 | 1.92 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.52 | 0.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.81 | 4.33 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.52% | 2.02% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.63% | 6.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.03% | -24.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.07% | -12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIBIX and SRBFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GIBIX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than SRBFX's 2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GIBIX has outperformed SRBFX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while SRBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SRBFX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Dividend Comparison
GIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than SRBFX's 4.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | 4.70% | 4.45% | 4.13% | 2.87% | 2.62% | 2.61% | 2.90% | 3.38% | 4.25% | 4.70% | 4.79% | 5.45% |
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 4.90% | 4.22% | 3.98% | 3.00% | 3.48% | 3.26% | 2.85% | 2.78% | 2.84% | 2.22% | 2.65% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIBIX drawdown since its inception was -22.03%, smaller than the maximum SRBFX drawdown of -24.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIBIX and SRBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIBIX vs. SRBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) is 1.54%, while Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that GIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.