RMQHX vs. ENPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. ENPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 59.46% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 59.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed ENPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while ENPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
ENPIX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 11.86%
- YTD
- 59.46%
- 6M
- 59.48%
- 1Y
- 46.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 29.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
ENPIX
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.29 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.70 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.83 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 4.11 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.29 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.77 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.21 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.13 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and ENPIX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than ENPIX's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.73% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum ENPIX drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and ENPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -90.12% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -27.20% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -36.48% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -84.54% | +21.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -3.26% | -16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -37.08% | +24.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 12.11% | -4.80% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) at 7.59%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | ENPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 7.59% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 20.88% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 37.08% | +10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 38.87% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 44.55% | +1.81% |