PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENPIX vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENPIX achieves a 48.84% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -16.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENPIX having a 7.88% annualized return and GDXJ not far ahead at 8.17%.


ENPIX

1D
0.83%
1M
15.87%
6M
22.86%
YTD
48.84%
1Y
59.39%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
28.19%
10Y*
7.88%
ALL TIME*
5.22%

GDXJ

1D
-3.69%
1M
-7.31%
6M
-23.13%
YTD
-16.16%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
40.59%
5Y*
17.64%
10Y*
8.17%
ALL TIME*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$446.17M$451.03M$619.88M

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
48.84%4.99%2.30%-7.46%92.17%82.32%-53.71%10.35%-30.54%-5.59%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-16.16%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ENPIX and GDXJ is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009

0.25

The correlation between ENPIX and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENPIX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ENPIX
ENPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENPIXGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.26

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

2.68

+3.41

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENPIX and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENPIX drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPIX and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENPIXGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.12%

-88.66%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.01%

-41.32%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.27%

-41.32%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-48.79%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.54%

-57.77%

-26.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.70%

-38.93%

+29.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-60.26%

+23.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.88%

19.42%

-10.54%

Volatility

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) is 9.02%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 14.90%. This indicates that ENPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENPIXGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.02%

14.90%

-5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.12%

44.56%

-19.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.65%

53.86%

-22.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.45%

42.07%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.70%

44.18%

+0.52%

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENPIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

ENPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than GDXJ's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
1.86%2.76%3.19%0.87%2.76%1.59%1.76%1.34%1.76%0.84%0.57%0.56%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.78%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENPIX and GDXJ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to ENPIX (9.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENPIX dropped -90.12% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

ENPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENPIX and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer