ENPIX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
ENPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Performance
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 62.19% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 5.50% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENPIX achieves a 62.19% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ENPIX has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 9.73%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.
ENPIX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 17.21%
- YTD
- 62.19%
- 6M
- 62.26%
- 1Y
- 50.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 31.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 8.53%
- 1M
- -23.14%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 114.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENPIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENPIX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
ENPIX
GDXJ
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENPIX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 2.27 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 2.50 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.52 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 12.30 | -8.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENPIX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 2.27 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.56 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.39 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.07 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENPIX and GDXJ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
ENPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than GDXJ's 2.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.70% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENPIX drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPIX and GDXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENPIX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -88.66% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.20% | -32.92% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -51.76% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.54% | -57.77% | -26.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -23.14% | +21.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -60.91% | +23.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.11% | 9.43% | +2.68% |
Volatility
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) is 7.58%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that ENPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENPIX | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 20.63% | -13.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 42.33% | -21.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 50.75% | -13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.87% | 40.56% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.55% | 44.45% | +0.10% |