ENPIX vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
ENPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENPIX or GDXJ.
Correlation
The correlation between ENPIX and GDXJ is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ENPIX:
0.44
GDXJ:
1.89
ENPIX:
0.75
GDXJ:
2.46
ENPIX:
1.09
GDXJ:
1.30
ENPIX:
0.31
GDXJ:
0.86
ENPIX:
1.02
GDXJ:
7.33
ENPIX:
11.58%
GDXJ:
9.01%
ENPIX:
26.74%
GDXJ:
35.01%
ENPIX:
-90.12%
GDXJ:
-88.66%
ENPIX:
-27.23%
GDXJ:
-60.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENPIX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 22.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ENPIX has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 0.87%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.93% annualized return.
ENPIX
11.91%
-1.50%
6.02%
10.42%
15.19%
0.87%
GDXJ
22.78%
11.56%
15.02%
66.95%
4.66%
8.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENPIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENPIX vs. GDXJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ENPIX
GDXJ
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
ENPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than GDXJ's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 2.85% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 1.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.12% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENPIX drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPIX and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENPIX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) at 8.74%. This indicates that ENPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.