RMME vs. LSAT
RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) and LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RMME charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LSAT.
Performance
RMME vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMME achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than LSAT's 10.47% return.
RMME
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSAT
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- —
RMME vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.56% | 0.29% |
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 10.47% | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMME and LSAT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMME vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank
RMME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LSAT
RMME vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMME | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMME vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMME drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMME and LSAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMME | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -20.48% | +20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -1.36% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -5.51% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
RMME vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMME | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 12.89% | -12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 16.25% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 16.74% | -16.31% |
RMME vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMME has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMME vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison
RMME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than LSAT's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% |
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.60% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMME and LSAT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMME is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMME is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.
LSAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.60% for RMME.
They also come from different issuers: Rareview and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RMME and 0.99% for LSAT.
Find the right allocation for RMME and LSAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer