PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMME vs. SGVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMME vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RMME having a 1.37% return and SGVT slightly higher at 1.40%.


RMME

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGVT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMME vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RMME and SGVT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMME vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RMME vs. SGVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMMESGVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.27

18.56

-10.30

Drawdowns

RMME vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMME drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, which is greater than SGVT's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMME and SGVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMMESGVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.03%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

RMME vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMMESGVTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

0.20%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.41%

0.20%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.41%

0.20%

+0.21%

RMME vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMME has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMME vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison

RMME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SGVT's 3.12% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMME and SGVT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RMME.

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.61% for RMME.

They also come from different issuers: Rareview and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RMME and 0.28% for SGVT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMME and SGVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer