RMME vs. BEGS
RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMME is a Money Market fund actively managed by Rareview, while BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RMME charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.
Performance
RMME vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMME achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BEGS's -40.92% return.
RMME
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEGS
- 1D
- -6.30%
- 1M
- -28.30%
- YTD
- -40.92%
- 6M
- -43.07%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMME vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.56% | 0.29% |
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | -40.92% | 9.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMME and BEGS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMME vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank
RMME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEGS
RMME vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMME | BEGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMME vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMME drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -56.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMME and BEGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMME | BEGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -56.22% | +56.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -56.22% | +56.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -17.95% | +17.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.38% | — |
Volatility
RMME vs. BEGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMME | BEGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 66.35% | -65.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 63.70% | -63.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 63.70% | -63.27% |
RMME vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMME has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMME vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison
RMME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than BEGS's 81.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | 81.64% | 48.23% |
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.60% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMME and BEGS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMME is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMME is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.
BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 81.64%, compared with 1.60% for RMME.
RMME is categorized as Money Market, while BEGS is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RMME and 0.99% for BEGS.
Find the right allocation for RMME and BEGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer