RMME vs. BEGS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMME is a Money Market fund actively managed by Rareview, while BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMME charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.

Performance

RMME vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMME achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than BEGS's -26.52% return.

RMME

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEGS

• 1D: -5.21%
• 1M: -17.51%
• YTD: -26.52%
• 6M: -24.27%
• 1Y: -11.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMME vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.37%	0.29%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-26.52%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RMME and BEGS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

RMME vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 7
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMME vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMME	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	8.27	0.03	+8.24

Drawdowns

RMME vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMME drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMME and BEGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMME	BEGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-45.55%	+45.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-45.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-45.55%	+45.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-16.47%	+16.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMME	BEGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	54.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41%	63.68%	-63.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.41%	62.40%	-61.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.41%	62.40%	-61.99%

RMME vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMME has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMME vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

RMME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BEGS's 65.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	65.63%	48.23%
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.61%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMME and BEGS in my portfolio?

RMME and BEGS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RMME or BEGS?

On fees, RMME is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMME or BEGS?

RMME is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMME or BEGS?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 65.63%, compared with 1.61% for RMME.

What is the main difference between RMME and BEGS?

RMME is categorized as Money Market, while BEGS is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RMME and 0.99% for BEGS.