RMIF vs. MANI
RMIF (LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMIF charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
RMIF vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMIF achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than MANI's 4.19% return.
RMIF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMIF vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | -0.77% | 1.22% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.19% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMIF and MANI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMIF vs. MANI — Risk / Return Rank
RMIF
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RMIF vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMIF | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMIF vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMIF drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMIF and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMIF | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -0.74% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.01% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -0.11% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
RMIF vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMIF | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 2.03% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 2.03% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.59% | 2.03% | +0.56% |
RMIF vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMIF has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMIF vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
RMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than MANI's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.17% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | 5.29% | 5.70% | 6.61% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMIF and MANI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MANI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MANI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RMIF.
RMIF has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 3.17% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for RMIF and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for RMIF and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer