PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RMIF vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RMIF and FFRHX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

RMIF vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
12.52%
17.29%
RMIF
FFRHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMIF:

3.63

FFRHX:

3.27

Sortino Ratio

RMIF:

5.42

FFRHX:

9.76

Omega Ratio

RMIF:

1.84

FFRHX:

3.15

Calmar Ratio

RMIF:

6.23

FFRHX:

9.68

Martin Ratio

RMIF:

38.63

FFRHX:

45.87

Ulcer Index

RMIF:

0.21%

FFRHX:

0.18%

Daily Std Dev

RMIF:

2.24%

FFRHX:

2.54%

Max Drawdown

RMIF:

-1.33%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

RMIF:

0.00%

FFRHX:

-0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMIF achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 0.39% return.


RMIF

YTD

0.95%

1M

0.33%

6M

3.94%

1Y

7.67%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFRHX

YTD

0.39%

1M

0.39%

6M

4.64%

1Y

8.36%

5Y*

5.58%

10Y*

4.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RMIF vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMIF has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


RMIF
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for RMIF: current value at 1.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.38%
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMIF vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMIF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMIF is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMIF is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMIF is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMIF is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMIF is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMIF is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMIF vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RMIF, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.423.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for RMIF, currently valued at 5.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.005.029.76
The chart of Omega ratio for RMIF, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.793.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for RMIF, currently valued at 5.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.005.759.68
The chart of Martin ratio for RMIF, currently valued at 35.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0035.5745.87
RMIF
FFRHX

The current RMIF Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMIF and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.602.803.003.203.403.603.804.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.42
3.27
RMIF
FFRHX

Dividends

RMIF vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

RMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than FFRHX's 8.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMIF
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
6.52%6.62%3.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.24%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

RMIF vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMIF drawdown since its inception was -1.33%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMIF and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.60%-0.50%-0.40%-0.30%-0.20%-0.10%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.22%
RMIF
FFRHX

Volatility

RMIF vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) is 0.47%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that RMIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.47%
0.66%
RMIF
FFRHX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab