PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANI vs. MATE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MANI vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 14.79% return.


MANI

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MATE

1D
-4.41%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
14.79%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANI vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.71%0.42%
MATE
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
14.79%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MANI and MATE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANI vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MANI vs. MATE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MANIMATEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.24

2.12

+2.13

Drawdowns

MANI vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and MATE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANIMATEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-13.24%

+12.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-5.02%

+4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-3.26%

+3.15%

Volatility

MANI vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANIMATEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

22.65%

-20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

22.65%

-20.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

22.65%

-20.58%

MANI vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MANI vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.18%3.00%
MATE
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MANI and MATE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MANI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MANI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

MANI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while MATE is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.97% for MATE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANI and MATE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer