RMIF vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
RMIF and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RMIF is an actively managed fund by Little Harbor Advisors. It was launched on Jun 8, 2023. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
RMIF vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMIF vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | -1.49% | 4.36% | 7.00% | 4.16% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.05% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 3.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMIF achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.05% return.
RMIF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMIF vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMIF has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMIF vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
RMIF
BND
RMIF vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMIF | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.99 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.41 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.81 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 4.98 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMIF | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.99 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | 0.59 | +1.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMIF and BND is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RMIF vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
RMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than BND's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF | 5.63% | 5.70% | 6.61% | 3.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.91% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
RMIF vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMIF drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMIF and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMIF | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -18.58% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -2.44% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.58% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -3.07% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.89% | -0.21% |
Volatility
RMIF vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.56% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMIF | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.63% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 2.52% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15% | 4.30% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 6.00% | -3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 5.52% | -2.90% |