MANI vs. CGMS
MANI (Man Active Income ETF) and CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MANI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGMS.
Performance
MANI vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than CGMS's 1.10% return.
MANI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CGMS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.85M | $28.44M | $28.60M | |
| $12.79K | $28.11K | $69.51K |
MANI vs. CGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.94% | 2.30% |
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.10% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANI and CGMS is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANI vs. CGMS — Risk / Return Rank
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGMS
MANI vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANI | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANI vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum CGMS drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and CGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANI | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -4.08% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.66% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility
MANI vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANI | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 3.49% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 5.07% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 5.07% | -3.11% |
MANI vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MANI vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison
MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than CGMS's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 6.11% | 6.00% | 5.91% | 5.84% | 0.97% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.65% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANI and CGMS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGMS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGMS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
CGMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 4.65% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.39% for CGMS.
Find the right allocation for MANI and CGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer