PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANI vs. MEMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MANI vs. MEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than MEMA's 17.22% return.


MANI

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEMA

1D
-6.29%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
17.22%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANI vs. MEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.71%0.42%
MEMA
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
17.22%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MANI and MEMA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANI vs. MEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MANI vs. MEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MANIMEMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.24

1.85

+2.39

Drawdowns

MANI vs. MEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum MEMA drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and MEMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANIMEMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-13.12%

+12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-8.51%

+8.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-2.75%

+2.64%

Volatility

MANI vs. MEMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANIMEMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

27.37%

-25.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

27.37%

-25.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

27.37%

-25.30%

MANI vs. MEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MANI and MEMA have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

MANI vs. MEMA - Dividend Comparison

MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while MEMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.18%3.00%
MEMA
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MANI and MEMA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MANI and MEMA have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for MEMA.

MANI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while MEMA is Emerging Markets Diversified.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANI and MEMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer