RMBS vs. RS
RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. RMBS operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while RS operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RMBS returned 22.22%/yr vs 19.82%/yr for RS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMBS vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 33.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has outperformed RS with an annualized return of 22.22%, while RS has yielded a comparatively lower 19.82% annualized return.
RMBS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -28.56%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 47.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 34.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
RS
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- 6M
- 19.14%
- YTD
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 15.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.54%
RMBS vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 9.75% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 33.64% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and RS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997 | 0.32 |
The correlation between RMBS and RS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$10.91B
RS:
$19.56B
RMBS:
$2.10
RS:
$14.06
RMBS:
48.00
RS:
27.26
RMBS:
15.31
RS:
1.41
RMBS:
$721.16M
RS:
$14.29B
RMBS:
$555.52M
RS:
$3.90B
RMBS:
$298.07M
RS:
$1.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBS vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
RMBS
RS
RMBS vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBS | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 0.71 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 1.21 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than RS's maximum drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBS | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -83.80% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.91% | -22.30% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.83% | -22.30% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | -22.32% | -26.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | -40.83% | -12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.91% | -7.32% | -33.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.74% | -16.44% | -58.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 13.05% | +4.51% |
Volatility
RMBS vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 24.72% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 8.46%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBS | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.72% | 8.46% | +16.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.94% | 18.50% | +46.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.98% | 26.39% | +53.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.46% | 27.91% | +28.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.94% | 29.56% | +17.38% |
Dividends
RMBS vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.28% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
RMBS vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMBS vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBS and RS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (24.72%) compared to RS (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBS and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer