RS vs. CTVA
RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) and CTVA (Corteva, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — RS in Steel, CTVA in Agricultural Inputs. Over the past 5 years, RS returned 22.89%/yr vs 14.20%/yr for CTVA. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RS vs. CTVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 41.64% return, which is significantly higher than CTVA's 17.96% return.
RS
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 24.17%
- YTD
- 41.64%
- 1Y
- 45.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.74%
CTVA
- 1D
- -11.90%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | $373.93M | $325.89M | $331.44M |
| $165.01M | $128.08M | $137.06M |
RS vs. CTVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 41.64% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 45.34% |
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 17.96% | 18.89% | 20.24% | -17.51% | 25.58% | 23.55% | 33.49% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between RS and CTVA is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RS and CTVA has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RS:
$20.73B
CTVA:
$52.64B
RS:
$17.15
CTVA:
$1.50
RS:
23.68
CTVA:
52.60
RS:
1.34
CTVA:
2.98
RS:
2.84
CTVA:
2.10
RS:
$15.81B
CTVA:
$17.81B
RS:
$1.92B
CTVA:
$2.47B
RS:
$1.52B
CTVA:
$2.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RS vs. CTVA — Risk / Return Rank
RS
CTVA
RS vs. CTVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RS | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.55 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 1.25 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RS vs. CTVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than CTVA's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and CTVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -34.76% | -49.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -18.50% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.30% | -22.02% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -34.76% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -13.04% | +11.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -10.36% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 8.19% | -1.03% |
Volatility
RS vs. CTVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) is 7.17%, while Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) has a volatility of 14.53%. This indicates that RS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RS | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 14.53% | -7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 20.32% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.63% | 26.61% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 27.52% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 32.67% | -3.09% |
Dividends
RS vs. CTVA - Dividend Comparison
RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than CTVA's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
RS vs. CTVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Corteva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RS vs. CTVA - Profitability Comparison
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of -1.10B and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.8%.
CTVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of -2.38B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -37.3%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 441.60M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
CTVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of 781.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 322.90M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
CTVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RS and CTVA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTVA has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to RS (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RS dropped -83.80% vs CTVA's -34.76%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RS and CTVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer