RS vs. QSR
Compare and contrast key facts about Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RS or QSR.
Performance
RS vs. QSR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's -9.42% return.
RS
15.82%
13.36%
5.87%
20.95%
24.61%
19.70%
QSR
-9.42%
-5.97%
4.04%
1.29%
4.89%
N/A
Fundamentals
| RS | QSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.97B | $31.18B |
| EPS | $18.26 | $3.99 |
| PE Ratio | 17.17 | 17.41 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.20 | 1.79 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $14.05B | $7.97B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.26B | $5.13B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.60B | $2.63B |
Key characteristics
| RS | QSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.73 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.39 | 0.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.03 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.07 | 0.07 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.87 | 0.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.23% | 11.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.69% | 22.03% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.80% | -63.03% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.07% | -14.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between RS and QSR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RS vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RS vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison
RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than QSR's 3.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.38% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 2.06% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.31% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RS vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and QSR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RS vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 5.14%. This indicates that RS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RS vs. QSR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities