RS vs. QSR
RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) and QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) are both stocks. RS operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RS returned 20.64%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for QSR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RS vs. QSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 39.03% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RS has outperformed QSR with an annualized return of 20.64%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.
RS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 39.03%
- 6M
- 35.97%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.64%
QSR
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 1.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
RS vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 39.03% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 6.89% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RS and QSR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RS and QSR has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RS:
$14.01
QSR:
$2.09
RS:
28.46
QSR:
34.32
RS:
1.47
QSR:
3.42
RS:
$14.29B
QSR:
$9.59B
RS:
$3.90B
QSR:
$3.17B
RS:
$1.30B
QSR:
$2.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RS vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank
RS
QSR
RS vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RS | QSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.04 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 2.22 | +0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RS vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and QSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RS | QSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -63.03% | -20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.30% | -13.29% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.30% | -24.53% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -29.27% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.83% | -63.03% | +22.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -11.48% | +7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -12.04% | -4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.90% | 6.19% | +6.71% |
Volatility
RS vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 6.54%. This indicates that RS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RS | QSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 6.54% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.48% | 17.47% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 23.27% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 22.71% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.64% | 27.50% | +2.14% |
Dividends
RS vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison
RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than QSR's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 4.41% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.23% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
RS vs. QSR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RS vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RS and QSR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RS has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to QSR (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RS dropped -83.80% vs QSR's -63.03%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RS and QSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer