PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RS vs. QSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

RS vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RS vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
6.77%9.12%-2.33%40.29%27.08%37.84%2.42%72.21%-15.12%10.49%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
11.04%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RS:

$16.09B

QSR:

$34.32B

EPS

RS:

$14.01

QSR:

$2.05

PE Ratio

RS:

21.93

QSR:

36.60

PS Ratio

RS:

1.13

QSR:

3.64

PB Ratio

RS:

2.24

QSR:

9.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

RS:

$14.29B

QSR:

$9.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RS:

$3.01B

QSR:

$2.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

RS:

$1.30B

QSR:

$2.32B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than QSR's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RS has outperformed QSR with an annualized return of 18.20%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.


RS

1D
1.08%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
6.77%
6M
9.42%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
18.20%

QSR

1D
1.62%
1M
5.30%
YTD
11.04%
6M
15.53%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RS vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RS
RS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RS vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSQSRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.68

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

1.07

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.27

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.64

2.79

-2.15

RS vs. QSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RS and QSR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSQSRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.68

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.29

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.37

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.36

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between RS and QSR is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RS vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than QSR's 3.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
1.58%1.66%1.63%1.43%1.73%1.70%2.09%1.84%2.81%2.10%2.07%2.76%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.34%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Drawdowns

RS vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and QSR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSQSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.80%

-63.03%

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.30%

-13.29%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-31.01%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-63.03%

+22.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.41%

-1.82%

-12.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.56%

-12.17%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

6.05%

+6.70%

Volatility

RS vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) is 6.11%, while Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that RS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSQSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

7.07%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

16.66%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.23%

23.49%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.94%

22.31%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

27.48%

+2.10%

Financials

RS vs. QSR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
3.50B
2.47B
(RS) Total Revenue
(QSR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RS vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober00
Portfolio components
RS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 166.30M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

RS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.