RS vs. SHW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).

Performance

RS vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RS vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.	6.77%	9.12%	-2.33%	40.29%	27.08%	37.84%	2.42%	72.21%	-15.12%	10.49%
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	0.74%	-3.83%	9.90%	32.73%	-31.96%	44.90%	27.05%	49.70%	-3.23%	54.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RS : $16.09B SHW : $81.03B
EPS RS : $14.01 SHW : $10.28
PE Ratio RS : 21.93 SHW : 31.69
PS Ratio RS : 1.13 SHW : 3.45
PB Ratio RS : 2.24 SHW : 17.62
Total Revenue (TTM) RS : $14.29B SHW : $23.59B
Gross Profit (TTM) RS : $3.01B SHW : $11.53B
EBITDA (TTM) RS : $1.30B SHW : $4.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RS has outperformed SHW with an annualized return of 18.20%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.

RS

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: 6.77%
• 6M: 9.42%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 7.84%
• 5Y*: 16.45%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

SHW

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: -6.26%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RS vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RS

RS Risk / Return Rank: 48
RS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

SHW

SHW Risk / Return Rank: 28
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RS vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RS	SHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	-0.25	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	-0.20	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.98	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	-0.31	+0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	-0.74	+1.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RS vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RS and SHW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RS	SHW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	-0.25	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.25	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.54	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.55	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between RS and SHW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RS vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than SHW's 0.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.	1.58%	1.66%	1.63%	1.43%	1.73%	1.70%	2.09%	1.84%	2.81%	2.10%	2.07%	2.76%
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company	0.97%	0.98%	0.84%	0.78%	1.01%	0.62%	0.73%	0.77%	0.87%	0.83%	1.25%	1.03%

Drawdowns

RS vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and SHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RS	SHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.80%	-52.02%	-31.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.30%	-18.74%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.32%	-42.46%	+20.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.83%	-42.46%	+1.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.41%	-17.61%	+3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-11.59%	-4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.75%	8.02%	+4.73%

Volatility

RS vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) is 6.11%, while The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that RS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RS	SHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	8.12%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	16.56%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.23%	25.11%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.94%	25.75%	+2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	26.27%	+3.31%

Financials

RS vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and The Sherwin-Williams Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 5.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.

RS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 166.30M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 775.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

RS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 476.80M and revenue of 5.61B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.