RS vs. SHW
Compare and contrast key facts about Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RS or SHW.
Correlation
The correlation between RS and SHW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RS vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RS:
-0.58
SHW:
0.13
RS:
-0.72
SHW:
0.34
RS:
0.92
SHW:
1.04
RS:
-0.75
SHW:
0.16
RS:
-1.14
SHW:
0.34
RS:
14.16%
SHW:
8.39%
RS:
27.80%
SHW:
22.34%
RS:
-83.80%
SHW:
-52.03%
RS:
-17.79%
SHW:
-14.59%
Fundamentals
RS:
$14.58B
SHW:
$85.68B
RS:
$15.55
SHW:
$10.54
RS:
17.71
SHW:
32.32
RS:
1.20
SHW:
3.85
RS:
$10.19B
SHW:
$17.73B
RS:
$2.91B
SHW:
$8.66B
RS:
$971.00M
SHW:
$3.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RS has outperformed SHW with an annualized return of 18.68%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.65% annualized return.
RS
2.69%
-1.69%
-0.86%
-17.42%
30.48%
18.68%
SHW
0.43%
-4.12%
-8.33%
2.75%
20.59%
14.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RS vs. SHW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RS
SHW
RS vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RS vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SHW's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.86% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
RS vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and SHW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RS vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 7.01%. This indicates that RS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RS vs. SHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities