RS vs. SHW
Compare and contrast key facts about Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RS or SHW.
Correlation
The correlation between RS and SHW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RS vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RS:
-0.09
SHW:
0.69
RS:
0.08
SHW:
1.11
RS:
1.01
SHW:
1.14
RS:
-0.13
SHW:
0.86
RS:
-0.21
SHW:
1.83
RS:
13.18%
SHW:
8.19%
RS:
29.31%
SHW:
21.63%
RS:
-83.80%
SHW:
-52.03%
RS:
-14.60%
SHW:
-11.06%
Fundamentals
RS:
$15.72B
SHW:
$91.01B
RS:
$18.27
SHW:
$10.55
RS:
15.90
SHW:
34.25
RS:
1.20
SHW:
4.04
RS:
$10.71B
SHW:
$23.10B
RS:
$3.09B
SHW:
$11.20B
RS:
$1.21B
SHW:
$4.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RS achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RS has outperformed SHW with an annualized return of 20.49%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively lower 15.22% annualized return.
RS
6.66%
4.51%
3.28%
0.80%
22.13%
20.49%
SHW
4.58%
5.77%
1.34%
16.69%
13.81%
15.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RS vs. SHW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RS
SHW
RS vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RS vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SHW's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
RS vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS and SHW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RS vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 5.74%. This indicates that RS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RS vs. SHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities