RMBS vs. CIFR
RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RMBS in Semiconductors, CIFR in Information Technology Services. Over the past 3 years, RMBS returned 32.27%/yr vs 113.71%/yr for CIFR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMBS vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 59.50% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 65.99% return.
RMBS
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 59.50%
- 6M
- 55.53%
- 1Y
- 141.61%
- 3Y*
- 32.27%
- 5Y*
- 49.08%
- 10Y*
- 28.27%
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.26%
- 1M
- 15.35%
- YTD
- 65.99%
- 6M
- 43.70%
- 1Y
- 538.02%
- 3Y*
- 113.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMBS vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 59.50% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 20.40% |
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 65.99% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% | -87.90% | -54.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and CIFR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$16.08B
CIFR:
$9.93B
RMBS:
$2.11
CIFR:
-$2.33
RMBS:
22.20
CIFR:
53.84
RMBS:
11.54
CIFR:
13.90
RMBS:
$721.16M
CIFR:
$174.98M
RMBS:
$555.52M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
RMBS:
$298.07M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBS vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
RMBS
CIFR
RMBS vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 10.56 | -6.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 21.19 | -11.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -97.16% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.69% | -51.38% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.83% | -71.74% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.12% | -6.81% | -7.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.88% | -66.24% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.62% | 25.57% | -10.95% |
Volatility
RMBS vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) is 28.11%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 31.19%. This indicates that RMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.11% | 31.19% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 72.25% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.00% | 109.30% | -33.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.40% | 121.97% | -66.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 121.97% | -75.67% |
Dividends
RMBS vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMBS nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RMBS vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBS and CIFR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (31.19%) compared to RMBS (28.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBS and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer