RLTY vs. BTCI
RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock, while BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, RLTY returned 11.76% vs -34.62% for BTCI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLTY vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.54% return.
RLTY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- -34.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLTY vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 9.57% | 8.56% | -13.49% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.54% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLTY and BTCI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLTY vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
RLTY
BTCI
RLTY vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLTY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | -0.74 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | -1.31 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLTY vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLTY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -47.16% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -47.16% | +35.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -44.94% | +42.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -15.92% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 26.71% | -23.28% |
Volatility
RLTY vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 3.99%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLTY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 12.11% | -8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 31.18% | -20.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 39.53% | -26.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 40.31% | -17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 40.31% | -17.64% |
Dividends
RLTY vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, less than BTCI's 48.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.02% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 8.55% | 8.98% | 8.93% | 9.18% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLTY and BTCI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to RLTY (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs BTCI's -47.16%.
RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLTY and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer