RLSIX vs. RPXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX).
RLSIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2012. RPXIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010.
Performance
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -12.16% | 8.57% | 16.06% | 43.85% | -53.89% | 2.10% | 54.74% | 20.00% | -2.20% | 22.10% |
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund | -13.34% | 13.18% | 22.55% | 51.57% | -47.37% | 1.09% | 55.28% | 32.49% | -4.78% | 30.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLSIX achieves a -12.16% return, which is significantly higher than RPXIX's -13.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RLSIX has underperformed RPXIX with an annualized return of 5.37%, while RPXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.
RLSIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
RPXIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- -13.34%
- 6M
- -12.24%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RPXIX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RLSIX vs. RPXIX — Risk / Return Rank
RLSIX
RPXIX
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLSIX | RPXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 0.28 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 0.56 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 0.71 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLSIX | RPXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.28 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | -0.04 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.41 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.46 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between RLSIX and RPXIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Dividend Comparison
RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund | 10.56% | 9.15% | 7.22% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.79% | 6.69% | 11.76% | 15.17% | 9.01% | 0.54% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, roughly equal to the maximum RPXIX drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and RPXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLSIX | RPXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -58.56% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -15.28% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | -58.56% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.82% | -58.56% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.87% | -20.17% | -14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.92% | -11.64% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 4.30% | +0.06% |
Volatility
RLSIX vs. RPXIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) is 3.92%, while RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that RLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RLSIX | RPXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 4.87% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 10.79% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 21.14% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 26.37% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 24.71% | -3.19% |